Blog | Hatch

Don’t “Wait and See”: Why Service Businesses that Delay AI Will Pay the Price

Written by Steven Knollmeyer | February 17, 2026

In a recent ServiceTitan industry report covered by Homepros, service businesses are splitting into two camps: those embedding AI into daily operations and those choosing to wait and see.

On the surface, waiting feels reasonable. AI is moving fast. Tools are noisy. No one wants to disrupt workflows that already feel stretched.

But in service operations, waiting isn’t neutral. It’s a decision with real revenue and operational consequences. For growing service businesses, the question is no longer if AI belongs in the front office.
It’s whether your communication infrastructure is built to scale — or to stall.

In this post, we'll break down why the cost of inaction is higher than most teams realize, what the data actually shows, and what it looks like to adopt AI in a way that scales your team instead of replacing it.

 

The real risk isn’t AI adoption, it's inaction.

Every service business runs on 1:1 customer communication:

  • Calls that need to be answered immediately
  • Leads that expect a response in minutes,not hours
  • Estimates that stall without follow-up
  • Customers who fall through the cracks when volume spikes

According to the ServiceTitan data, only 12% of service businesses have fully embedded AI into their operations, while 41% report taking a wait-and-see approach and 34% are limited to small-scale experimentation.

Demand isn’t slowing down while leaders evaluate. Customers don’t pause expectations because internal systems can’t keep up.

When response speed lags or follow-up depends on overloaded teams, revenue quietly disappears. Waiting doesn’t preserve the status quo but it locks in inefficiency.

 

Data that matters: AI is already delivering value

This isn’t speculative adoption. The same report shows AI is already delivering measurable gains:

  • Two-thirds of service teams using or testing AI report saving more than three hours per week through automation
  • AI adoption is highest in administrative workflows (59%), followed by marketing and sales (51%), and customer service and field operations (39%)

These are the workflows that break first when volume increases and the exact moments where speed, consistency, and follow-up determine whether revenue is captured or lost.

 

AI isn’t about replacing people, it’s about scaling them

One of the biggest reasons teams hesitate is fear,especially among CSRs, that AI means replacement.

That’s not how modern service operations work.

At Hatch, AI and humans work as one operational layer by design:

AI CSRs handle speed, volume, and consistency across voice, SMS, and email — so human CSRs can focus on nuance, escalation, and real customer connection.

This isn’t automation for automation’s sake, it’s operational leverage.

The result:

  • Faster response times without adding headcount
  • Standardized performance across every channel and location
  • Less burnout for frontline teams
  • Clear visibility for managers
  • More confident, consistent customer experiences

AI becomes infrastructure — not another tool to manage.

 

Early movers aren’t just experimenting, they’re building an advantage.

The service businesses actively embedding AI aren’t chasing hype. They’re solving operational problems:

  • Converting more inbound demand with less effort
  • Protecting margins as labor costs rise
  • Scaling communication capacity without scaling complexity
  • Making revenue more predictable and repeatable

The report shows efficiency and productivity gains are the top benefits contractors associate with AI, outweighing even direct cost reduction.

That advantage compounds over time and waiting doesn’t just delay results, it widens the gap between leaders and laggards.

 

The future of service operations is already here

The industry is moving from disconnected tools to unified operational systems.

AI is no longer an add-on. It’s becoming the foundation that allows service businesses to scale revenue — without scaling complexity.

Teams that move now gain:

  • Control, not chaos
  • Visibility, not guesswork
  • Scale, without burnout

Those who wait will still adopt — but later, under pressure, and with less ability to shape outcomes.